(+add note about trans women and genderqueer people) |
Tags: Visual edit apiedit |
||
(78 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
When choosing a name, it's important to be welcoming to trans women and not just cis women. Additionally, if you want to include genderqueer and/or non-binary-identified people who aren't male in your organization, it's worth thinking about how to choose a name that is inclusive. |
When choosing a name, it's important to be welcoming to trans women and not just cis women. Additionally, if you want to include genderqueer and/or non-binary-identified people who aren't male in your organization, it's worth thinking about how to choose a name that is inclusive. |
||
− | == |
+ | ==Women== |
Examples: |
Examples: |
||
* Tends to be used in [[List of academic organizations interested in women in CS|university CS groups]] |
* Tends to be used in [[List of academic organizations interested in women in CS|university CS groups]] |
||
− | * Popular with Linux distros - [[Debian Women]], [[FedoraWomen]], [[Ubuntu Women]], [[ |
+ | * Popular with Linux distros - [[Debian Women]], [[FedoraWomen]], [[Ubuntu Women]], [[GnomeWomen]], [[KDEWomen]] |
* (GNOME) [[Outreach Program for Women]] |
* (GNOME) [[Outreach Program for Women]] |
||
* [[Women in Drupal]] - formerly DrupalChix |
* [[Women in Drupal]] - formerly DrupalChix |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* [[WikiWomen]] |
* [[WikiWomen]] |
||
* [[Ruby Women]] |
* [[Ruby Women]] |
||
+ | * [[Women Who Code]] |
||
+ | * [[OWOOT|Oceania Women of Open Tech (OWOOT)]] |
||
Pros: |
Pros: |
||
− | * Probably the most neutral term available now |
+ | * Probably the most neutral term available now. Less polarizing than other terms. |
+ | * Very inclusive to adult women, especially ages 25-120 |
||
+ | * Common on restroom signs |
||
+ | * Recommended in journalism by AP Stylebook |
||
Cons: |
Cons: |
||
* Doesn't rhyme with anything |
* Doesn't rhyme with anything |
||
* Younger women and teenagers don't necessarily associate themselves with the term |
* Younger women and teenagers don't necessarily associate themselves with the term |
||
+ | * Can feel overly formal and businesslike |
||
==Ladies== |
==Ladies== |
||
Line 25: | Line 31: | ||
* [[Lambda Ladies]] |
* [[Lambda Ladies]] |
||
* [[Tech Lady Mafia]] |
* [[Tech Lady Mafia]] |
||
+ | * [[Glorious Ladies of Free Software]][http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Womenscaucus] |
||
Pros: |
Pros: |
||
⚫ | * Commonly reappropriated in hip-hop feminism, e.g. [http://rap.genius.com/Queen-latifah-ladies-first-lyrics Ladies First] by Queen Latifah. Has come back into vogue in recent years [http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2012/11/29/hey-lady-an-exchange/][http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/society-and-culture/a-ladylike-comeback-20111208-1ol9f.html] |
||
− | * Fun in a retro/ironic way? |
||
+ | * Can be fun in a retro, ironic way, e.g. "Single Ladies" by <span style="color:rgb(37,37,37);font-family:sans-serif;font-size:14.399999618530273px;line-height:17.920000076293945px;">Beyoncé</span> |
||
+ | * <span style="line-height:17.920000076293945px;">Commonly used on restroom signs in some places, esp. multicultural urban areas</span> |
||
+ | * <span style="line-height:17.920000076293945px;">More casual and playful than "women"</span> |
||
+ | * <span style="line-height:17.920000076293945px;">Commonly used by college-aged women who might not identify with the term "woman" yet. Widely used by sororities. [http://publicrelationsmatters.com/tag/ap-style/ [3]] </span> |
||
Cons: |
Cons: |
||
+ | * Offensive in some places and contexts [http://ask.metafilter.com/200453/Why-are-some-women-offended-by-the-term-ladies [4]] |
||
⚫ | * |
||
+ | * Can feel overly old-fashioned |
||
+ | * Can feel classist |
||
+ | * "Woman" preferred over "lady" in journalism. AP Stylebook says, "lady: Do not use as a synonym for women. Lady may be used when it is a courtesy title or when a specific reference to fine manners is appropriate without patronizing overtones." [5] |
||
+ | * Association with the correct manners, and gendered rules: e.g. ladylike. |
||
==Female== |
==Female== |
||
Examples: |
Examples: |
||
− | * [ |
+ | * [http://www.fitt.org.au/ Females in Information Technology and Telecommunications] |
− | Pros: |
+ | ;Pros: |
+ | * Age-inclusive |
||
+ | * Inclusive of people who don't feel practically feminine even though they identify as female. |
||
− | Cons: |
+ | ;Cons: |
* Often considered disrespectful or demeaning in modern usage. [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/magazine/18wwlnsafire.t.html?_r=0] |
* Often considered disrespectful or demeaning in modern usage. [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/magazine/18wwlnsafire.t.html?_r=0] |
||
− | * |
+ | * Can be exclusive to trans women due to use by trans-excluding radical feminists to refer exclusively to cis women. |
==Girls== |
==Girls== |
||
Line 47: | Line 64: | ||
* [[Go Girl, Go for IT]] (for girls) |
* [[Go Girl, Go for IT]] (for girls) |
||
* [[Girls' Programming Network]] (for girls) |
* [[Girls' Programming Network]] (for girls) |
||
+ | * [http://girldevelopit.com/ Girl Develop It] |
||
* [[Girl Geek Dinners]] |
* [[Girl Geek Dinners]] |
||
+ | * [[Geek Girl Tech Conferences]] |
||
+ | * [[GeekGirlCon]] |
||
+ | * [[RailsGirls]] |
||
* [[DjangoGirls]] |
* [[DjangoGirls]] |
||
Pros: |
Pros: |
||
+ | * concise |
||
− | * One syllable |
||
+ | * appropriate for groups intended for ages 5-18 |
||
Cons: |
Cons: |
||
− | * Off-putting/infantilising |
+ | * Off-putting/infantilising to some women |
+ | * Used widely in sexualizing contexts, can lead to undesirable web search results |
||
+ | * professional women in male-dominated fields may have strong association between being called a girl and sexist (micro)aggression |
||
* Can be confusing to actual intent of audience |
* Can be confusing to actual intent of audience |
||
+ | * often paired with "men", making a mix of adult and child words. e.g. "you can choose from men's tshirts, or girl's tshirts". see also [[T-shirts]] |
||
==Grrls== |
==Grrls== |
||
Examples: |
Examples: |
||
+ | * [[LinuxChix]]'s grrls-only mailing list. |
||
− | * ? |
||
− | Pros |
+ | Pros: |
* Rad 90s RiotGrrl zine vibe |
* Rad 90s RiotGrrl zine vibe |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * Similar to 'girls', can be off-putting to women |
||
+ | * Can be alienating |
||
+ | * suitability limited to contexts where a read rad 90s RiotGrrl zine vibe is relevant |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==Gals== |
||
+ | Examples: |
||
+ | * [https://www.facebook.com/hackergals Hacker Gals] |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Casual, fun |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * Similar to 'girls', can be off-putting to women |
||
+ | * Trivialising? Depends on purpose of the group |
||
==Chicks/Chix== |
==Chicks/Chix== |
||
Line 70: | Line 111: | ||
* [[CodeChix]] |
* [[CodeChix]] |
||
* [[DevChix]] |
* [[DevChix]] |
||
− | * |
+ | * DrupalChix (changed to [[Women in Drupal]]) |
− | Pros |
+ | Pros: |
+ | *Fun, casual, and light-hearted. Playful. |
||
+ | *Fun and empowering to [[Reclamation|reclaim]] the word. |
||
+ | *Common in women's tech group names. Easily identifiable as a fun technical women's group. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
* Pretty 90s. |
* Pretty 90s. |
||
+ | * "Chicks" is a trivialising and somewhat sexualized term for women. So using it has the pros/cons of [[reclamation]]. |
||
+ | * Can be embarrassing or accidentally offensive to say aloud because it sounds like saying "chicks," e.g. sounds like saying, "Are you going to the Linux Chicks meetup?" |
||
+ | * If referred to by a man verbally, it can cause accidental insult, e.g. "You're a Dev Chick, right?" |
||
==Dolls== |
==Dolls== |
||
Line 81: | Line 130: | ||
Pros/Cons: |
Pros/Cons: |
||
* Very informal |
* Very informal |
||
+ | * Dolls are actually objects, not people. |
||
− | |||
==Sisters== |
==Sisters== |
||
Line 87: | Line 136: | ||
* [[Systers]] |
* [[Systers]] |
||
* CSters (a university group) |
* CSters (a university group) |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Not necessarily too casual |
||
+ | * Age-inclusive at both ends |
||
+ | * Not classist or dated |
||
+ | * Free of solid association to the trivializing, sexualizing, objectifying use of words like 'girls' or 'chicks'. |
||
Cons: |
Cons: |
||
* Suggests a level of closeness that may be offputting for a casual group. |
* Suggests a level of closeness that may be offputting for a casual group. |
||
− | ==Feminist== |
+ | == Feminist == |
+ | ''See also [[Explicitly feminist geek groups]]'' |
||
+ | |||
Examples: |
Examples: |
||
+ | * Geek Feminism |
||
* [[Feminist Frequency]] |
* [[Feminist Frequency]] |
||
− | Pros |
+ | Pros: |
+ | * explicitly claims a feminist space |
||
+ | * does not exclude feminists who aren't women |
||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * may be alienating to [[Not all geek women are feminists|women who are not feminists]] |
||
+ | * does not work for a woman-only space |
||
==Divas== |
==Divas== |
||
* [[Digital Divas]] (for girls) |
* [[Digital Divas]] (for girls) |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * fun and casual |
||
+ | * does not exclude non-cis women |
||
Cons: |
Cons: |
||
− | * |
+ | * may be alienating to women who do not identify as 'divas' and/or traditionally feminine |
+ | * may be alienating to women who want to be taken seriously |
||
+ | * may take the attention from the actual content to associations with the word 'diva' (melodrama, physical appearance, grand personas) |
||
+ | * negative term for self-centered, overly dramatic people. |
||
+ | ==Broads== |
||
⚫ | |||
Examples: |
Examples: |
||
− | * [[ |
+ | * [[Broad Universe]] |
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * casual |
||
+ | * short |
||
+ | * lends itself to puns |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * outdated |
||
+ | * offensive term in certain spheres. |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Identity references == |
||
+ | Examples: |
||
+ | * Lesbians Who Tech |
||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Explicitly includes women of that identity |
||
+ | * Can include other people if the group desires |
||
+ | * Can exclude women who are not of that identity in order to focus on the unique intersecting issues of being a woman with that identity in tech |
||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * Excludes women who are not of that identity (who are in other under-served populations), if only by implication |
||
+ | * Even if the group's rules include other people, the name may discourage people (in other under-served populations) who would be welcomed if they joined, from doing any further research on the group |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Womyn == |
||
+ | Seen in feminist literature and as a self-identification |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Symbolically removes dependence on men/males |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * Not usually taken seriously |
||
+ | * May be taken as a claim of radical feminism |
||
+ | * Term is widely used by Trans-Exclusive Radical Feminists and is strongly associated with Transmisogynistic bigotry |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Unicorns == |
||
+ | From the [[unicorn law]], ie, female geeks supposedly being as rare/mythical as a unicorn. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Examples: |
||
+ | *The [[Haecksen miniconf]] doesn't use it as a name, but has made considerable use of unicorn logos. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Lends itself well to visuals. |
||
+ | * Fun, different. |
||
+ | * Non-obvious connection to feminism. |
||
+ | * Unicorns/horses/ponies are somewhat feminine-coded: embracing feminine-coded symbols can be powerful |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * The term is not well known outside the geek feminism community, and therefore can confuse or alienate people. |
||
+ | * Not explicitly about women. |
||
+ | * Haecksen found that some men missed the irony and were encouraged to ''actually treat women like unicorns'': ie, to photograph them and exclaim over a coveted "unicorn" sighting. |
||
+ | * You will sometimes be mistaken for a pop culture fan group (eg, for ''My Little Ponies'') |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==Mother/Mom== |
||
+ | Examples: |
||
+ | * [[Mothership HackerMoms]] |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros/Cons: |
||
+ | * Only a good idea if explicitly for mothers and that is relevant to the group |
||
+ | * Terms for female parent vary widely even within english speaking cultures. Words like mum, mom, mama, noni, nan etc are coded to narrow group who use that term. |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==She/Her (female pronouns)== |
||
+ | Examples: |
||
+ | * [[BlogHer]] |
||
+ | * [[She's Geeky]] |
||
+ | * [[She Hacks]] |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * concise |
||
+ | * clear |
||
+ | * encompasses all who identify with the pronouns she/her |
||
+ | * about as little sexist/infantilising/classist/generational schemata as possible |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * use of the word 'her' can produce phrases that are objectifying on the grammatical level |
||
+ | * may produce names that sound more like phrases than names |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Miss/Ms/Mrs (female titles) == |
||
+ | Examples: |
||
+ | * [[MzTek]] |
||
+ | * [[Miss Baltazar's Laboratory]] |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Short. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * Can feel classist and dated. |
||
+ | * Can feel overly formal. |
||
+ | * Negative connotations if used to formulate a woman-specific version of a gender-neutral name. |
||
+ | * Has baggage from a history of women being required to declare their marital status publicly via their title, while men do not. |
||
+ | |||
+ | == XX == |
||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Biology reference |
||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * Inherently chromosomal-essentialist: implies that all people with XX chromosomes are women, and that no one without XX chromosomes are women. |
||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | Examples: |
||
⚫ | |||
Pro: |
Pro: |
||
Line 115: | Line 281: | ||
* Can be obscure |
* Can be obscure |
||
− | ==Name reference to a famous woman in the field== |
+ | == Name reference to a famous woman in the field == |
− | * [[ |
+ | * [[Anita Borg Institute]] |
+ | * [[Grace Hopper Celebration]] |
||
+ | * [[Ada Initiative]] and [[AdaCamp]] |
||
* [[Disreputable Order of Hopperites]] |
* [[Disreputable Order of Hopperites]] |
||
* Edinburgh University Hoppers |
* Edinburgh University Hoppers |
||
Pros: |
Pros: |
||
− | * Different |
+ | * Different. |
+ | * Works against erasure, dismissal, and ignorance of women's historical importance in the field. |
||
+ | * Suits familiar naming conventions for institutions and such. |
||
Cons: |
Cons: |
||
− | * May be too obscure |
+ | * May be too obscure if you choose a lesser-known name. |
+ | * May not be that different if you choose a well-known name. |
||
+ | * May be long. |
||
==Borrowing from other languages== |
==Borrowing from other languages== |
||
Examples: |
Examples: |
||
* [[Haecksen]] |
* [[Haecksen]] |
||
+ | * [[Foufem]] (based in a bilingual city) |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Valid choice for events/groups held in languages other than English |
||
+ | |||
+ | Cons: |
||
+ | * Obscure for an English audience |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==No gender connotation at all== |
||
+ | Examples: |
||
+ | * Seems to be popular with [[feminist hackerspaces]] - [[Double Union]], [[Seattle Attic]], [[Spanning Tree]] |
||
+ | * [[PyStar]] |
||
+ | * [[Code n Splode]] |
||
+ | |||
+ | Pros: |
||
+ | * Lots of flexibility |
||
+ | * Can avoid a connotation that your group intends to be the ''only'' women's group with your scope (as opposed to "ProjectName Women" or "CityName Feminist Hackerspace" |
||
Cons: |
Cons: |
||
+ | * May need a nearly permanent subtitle |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | * Not obvious in a passing reference that women are the intended audience |
||
[[Category:Community]] |
[[Category:Community]] |
||
+ | [[Category:Resources]] |
Latest revision as of 03:33, 29 October 2016
Are you founding a women geeks group? Then you'll probably need a name. Here are some words/terms/names you could use to show that it is for women.
When choosing a name, it's important to be welcoming to trans women and not just cis women. Additionally, if you want to include genderqueer and/or non-binary-identified people who aren't male in your organization, it's worth thinking about how to choose a name that is inclusive.
Women
Examples:
- Tends to be used in university CS groups
- Popular with Linux distros - Debian Women, FedoraWomen, Ubuntu Women, GnomeWomen, KDEWomen
- (GNOME) Outreach Program for Women
- Women in Drupal - formerly DrupalChix
- PHP Women
- WikiWomen
- Ruby Women
- Women Who Code
- Oceania Women of Open Tech (OWOOT)
Pros:
- Probably the most neutral term available now. Less polarizing than other terms.
- Very inclusive to adult women, especially ages 25-120
- Common on restroom signs
- Recommended in journalism by AP Stylebook
Cons:
- Doesn't rhyme with anything
- Younger women and teenagers don't necessarily associate themselves with the term
- Can feel overly formal and businesslike
Ladies
Examples:
Pros:
- Commonly reappropriated in hip-hop feminism, e.g. Ladies First by Queen Latifah. Has come back into vogue in recent years [2][3]
- Can be fun in a retro, ironic way, e.g. "Single Ladies" by Beyoncé
- Commonly used on restroom signs in some places, esp. multicultural urban areas
- More casual and playful than "women"
- Commonly used by college-aged women who might not identify with the term "woman" yet. Widely used by sororities. [3]
Cons:
- Offensive in some places and contexts [4]
- Can feel overly old-fashioned
- Can feel classist
- "Woman" preferred over "lady" in journalism. AP Stylebook says, "lady: Do not use as a synonym for women. Lady may be used when it is a courtesy title or when a specific reference to fine manners is appropriate without patronizing overtones." [5]
- Association with the correct manners, and gendered rules: e.g. ladylike.
Female
Examples:
- Pros
- Age-inclusive
- Inclusive of people who don't feel practically feminine even though they identify as female.
- Cons
- Often considered disrespectful or demeaning in modern usage. [4]
- Can be exclusive to trans women due to use by trans-excluding radical feminists to refer exclusively to cis women.
Girls
Examples:
- Black Girls Code (for girls)
- Go Girl, Go for IT (for girls)
- Girls' Programming Network (for girls)
- Girl Develop It
- Girl Geek Dinners
- Geek Girl Tech Conferences
- GeekGirlCon
- RailsGirls
- DjangoGirls
Pros:
- concise
- appropriate for groups intended for ages 5-18
Cons:
- Off-putting/infantilising to some women
- Used widely in sexualizing contexts, can lead to undesirable web search results
- professional women in male-dominated fields may have strong association between being called a girl and sexist (micro)aggression
- Can be confusing to actual intent of audience
- often paired with "men", making a mix of adult and child words. e.g. "you can choose from men's tshirts, or girl's tshirts". see also T-shirts
Grrls
Examples:
- LinuxChix's grrls-only mailing list.
Pros:
- Rad 90s RiotGrrl zine vibe
Cons:
- Similar to 'girls', can be off-putting to women
- Can be alienating
- suitability limited to contexts where a read rad 90s RiotGrrl zine vibe is relevant
Gals
Examples:
Pros:
- Casual, fun
Cons:
- Similar to 'girls', can be off-putting to women
- Trivialising? Depends on purpose of the group
Chicks/Chix
Examples:
- LinuxChix
- WikiChix
- CodeChix
- DevChix
- DrupalChix (changed to Women in Drupal)
Pros:
- Fun, casual, and light-hearted. Playful.
- Fun and empowering to reclaim the word.
- Common in women's tech group names. Easily identifiable as a fun technical women's group.
Cons:
- Pretty 90s.
- "Chicks" is a trivialising and somewhat sexualized term for women. So using it has the pros/cons of reclamation.
- Can be embarrassing or accidentally offensive to say aloud because it sounds like saying "chicks," e.g. sounds like saying, "Are you going to the Linux Chicks meetup?"
- If referred to by a man verbally, it can cause accidental insult, e.g. "You're a Dev Chick, right?"
Dolls
Examples:
Pros/Cons:
- Very informal
- Dolls are actually objects, not people.
Sisters
Examples:
- Systers
- CSters (a university group)
Pros:
- Not necessarily too casual
- Age-inclusive at both ends
- Not classist or dated
- Free of solid association to the trivializing, sexualizing, objectifying use of words like 'girls' or 'chicks'.
Cons:
- Suggests a level of closeness that may be offputting for a casual group.
Feminist
See also Explicitly feminist geek groups
Examples:
- Geek Feminism
- Feminist Frequency
Pros:
- explicitly claims a feminist space
- does not exclude feminists who aren't women
Cons:
- may be alienating to women who are not feminists
- does not work for a woman-only space
Divas
- Digital Divas (for girls)
Pros:
- fun and casual
- does not exclude non-cis women
Cons:
- may be alienating to women who do not identify as 'divas' and/or traditionally feminine
- may be alienating to women who want to be taken seriously
- may take the attention from the actual content to associations with the word 'diva' (melodrama, physical appearance, grand personas)
- negative term for self-centered, overly dramatic people.
Broads
Examples:
Pros:
- casual
- short
- lends itself to puns
Cons:
- outdated
- offensive term in certain spheres.
Identity references
Examples:
- Lesbians Who Tech
Pros:
- Explicitly includes women of that identity
- Can include other people if the group desires
- Can exclude women who are not of that identity in order to focus on the unique intersecting issues of being a woman with that identity in tech
Cons:
- Excludes women who are not of that identity (who are in other under-served populations), if only by implication
- Even if the group's rules include other people, the name may discourage people (in other under-served populations) who would be welcomed if they joined, from doing any further research on the group
Womyn
Seen in feminist literature and as a self-identification
Pros:
- Symbolically removes dependence on men/males
Cons:
- Not usually taken seriously
- May be taken as a claim of radical feminism
- Term is widely used by Trans-Exclusive Radical Feminists and is strongly associated with Transmisogynistic bigotry
Unicorns
From the unicorn law, ie, female geeks supposedly being as rare/mythical as a unicorn.
Examples:
- The Haecksen miniconf doesn't use it as a name, but has made considerable use of unicorn logos.
Pros:
- Lends itself well to visuals.
- Fun, different.
- Non-obvious connection to feminism.
- Unicorns/horses/ponies are somewhat feminine-coded: embracing feminine-coded symbols can be powerful
Cons:
- The term is not well known outside the geek feminism community, and therefore can confuse or alienate people.
- Not explicitly about women.
- Haecksen found that some men missed the irony and were encouraged to actually treat women like unicorns: ie, to photograph them and exclaim over a coveted "unicorn" sighting.
- You will sometimes be mistaken for a pop culture fan group (eg, for My Little Ponies)
Mother/Mom
Examples:
Pros/Cons:
- Only a good idea if explicitly for mothers and that is relevant to the group
- Terms for female parent vary widely even within english speaking cultures. Words like mum, mom, mama, noni, nan etc are coded to narrow group who use that term.
She/Her (female pronouns)
Examples:
- BlogHer
- She's Geeky
- She Hacks
Pros:
- concise
- clear
- encompasses all who identify with the pronouns she/her
- about as little sexist/infantilising/classist/generational schemata as possible
Cons:
- use of the word 'her' can produce phrases that are objectifying on the grammatical level
- may produce names that sound more like phrases than names
Miss/Ms/Mrs (female titles)
Examples:
- MzTek
- Miss Baltazar's Laboratory
Pros:
- Short.
Cons:
- Can feel classist and dated.
- Can feel overly formal.
- Negative connotations if used to formulate a woman-specific version of a gender-neutral name.
- Has baggage from a history of women being required to declare their marital status publicly via their title, while men do not.
XX
Pros:
- Biology reference
Cons:
- Inherently chromosomal-essentialist: implies that all people with XX chromosomes are women, and that no one without XX chromosomes are women.
Abbreviation that uses one of the above terms
Examples:
- WoMoz, short for "Women & Mozilla"
Pro:
- If you can make a nice acronym it can work well
Con:
- Can be obscure
Name reference to a famous woman in the field
- Anita Borg Institute
- Grace Hopper Celebration
- Ada Initiative and AdaCamp
- Disreputable Order of Hopperites
- Edinburgh University Hoppers
Pros:
- Different.
- Works against erasure, dismissal, and ignorance of women's historical importance in the field.
- Suits familiar naming conventions for institutions and such.
Cons:
- May be too obscure if you choose a lesser-known name.
- May not be that different if you choose a well-known name.
- May be long.
Borrowing from other languages
Examples:
- Haecksen
- Foufem (based in a bilingual city)
Pros:
- Valid choice for events/groups held in languages other than English
Cons:
- Obscure for an English audience
- Potentially appropriative
No gender connotation at all
Examples:
- Seems to be popular with feminist hackerspaces - Double Union, Seattle Attic, Spanning Tree
- PyStar
- Code n Splode
Pros:
- Lots of flexibility
- Can avoid a connotation that your group intends to be the only women's group with your scope (as opposed to "ProjectName Women" or "CityName Feminist Hackerspace"
Cons:
- May need a nearly permanent subtitle
- Not obvious in a passing reference that women are the intended audience