Geek Feminism Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
   
 
[[User:Smilebit|Smilebit]] ([[User talk:Smilebit|talk]]) 05:34, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
 
[[User:Smilebit|Smilebit]] ([[User talk:Smilebit|talk]]) 05:34, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
  +
SmileBit: Is this page written from personal experience? Much of it reads as a narative of events as happened to one individual, rather than constructive edits to this topic. [[User:ShinyShiny|ShinyShiny]] ([[User talk:ShinyShiny|talk]]) 04:06, December 16, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:06, 16 December 2012

I would add scientific advancements in nanotechnology to this page, but I don't have enough information on that yet.

Smilebit (talk) 18:50, December 11, 2012 (UTC)


Nano tech is off topic. Working out if your body has been messed with by invisible nano tech robots doesn't belong on a  geek feminism wiki.




I'll let the mods handle this one.  I added this topic because it covers women's health, science, and technology, all related to geek feminism.  Here's an article to scratch the surface.  It's also a global issue involving the import and export of food products.

Smilebit (talk) 21:21, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

Also, there's nanomedicine, which would be related to mental health and postcolonial feminism.  Nanotechnology is a fairly new field and also pretty exciting, with great benefits and potential abuses.

Smilebit (talk) 05:40, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Another interesting article I found on nanotechnology and gene manipulation.

Also nanotechnology and privacy.

Nanotechnology and gender implications.

Societal impact of nanotechnology as well.  Also related, regulation of nanotechnology.

A list of nanotechnology applications.

Sexism, racism, and other -isms are subtle today.  In regards to health care, it would be fairly challenging for people from marginalized groups to convince doctors that their bodies are being influenced by something they can't see.

Smilebit (talk) 05:34, December 14, 2012 (UTC)


SmileBit: Is this page written from personal experience? Much of it reads as a narative of events as happened to one individual, rather than constructive edits to this topic. ShinyShiny (talk) 04:06, December 16, 2012 (UTC)