Geek Feminism Wiki
No edit summary
m (Reverted edits by 60.224.184.12 (talk | block) to last version by Monadic)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Fat acceptance''' (sometimes '''size acceptance''') is a radical movement that expects men (masters) to treat fat women as if they are human. Fat acceptance is therefore defined as "stop eating so much macdonalds you fat fucks and go to the gym"
+
'''Fat acceptance''' (sometimes '''size acceptance''') is an anti-oppression movement opposing discrimination against people who are fat or obese.
   
  +
== Principles ==
  +
* thinness and health are far from perfectly correlated, but public health information and commercial interests regularly conflate weight loss with getting fitter and/or healthier in a way that is cruel, shaming, and not evidence-based
  +
* there is no known evidence-based weight-loss regime that results in long-term weight loss for all but a small minority of fat people
  +
* fat people are targeted for shaming and discriminated against, in particular:
  +
** they are subject to slurs and harassment
  +
** they have difficulty getting medical care without constant discussion of their weight and weight-loss plans, many have serious disorders ignored or misdiagnosed because it is assumed they'd be healthier if they lost weight
  +
* people do not have an obligation to themselves or to society to be healthy in any case, so even if body size is unhealthy for an individual, it is not therefore imperative on them to lose weight or imperative on others to try and convince them to do so
   
  +
== Fat discrimination in geek culture ==
   
  +
Discrimination against fat people takes some particular forms in geek culture:
It is estimated 6billion feminists die each year sucking dick / eating macdonalds.
 
  +
* many geeks pride themselves on using science- and evidence-based approaches to life, and see being fat as an irrational choice
  +
* some geeks interpret the findings of evolutionary biology as meaning that people they judge as unhealthy or unattractive ''should'' not reproduce or even should ''die'' in order to serve the goal of improving the gene pool
  +
* geek women are often supposed to be "hot" in order to be welcome: thin, young and otherwise conventionally attractive
  +
  +
== Intersectionality problems ==
  +
  +
As with many anti-oppression movements, there are sometimes intersectionality problems, where the movement caters mostly to otherwise privileged fat people. Some fat acceptance arguments have been criticised on several axes:
  +
* that the emphasis on research findings that fat people aren't especially likely to be unhealthy hurts people at the intersection of being fat and being [[Disability|disabled]], by feeding the idea that it is ''is'' acceptable to discriminate against people who are unhealthy: see [http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/10/11/further-conversations-on-body-image-examining-health-at-every-size-haes/ Further Conversations On Body Image: Examining Health at Every Size (HAES)]
  +
* that fat white people claim that they are especially oppressed because white culture is especially anti-fat, and thus silencing people of color in fat discussions. Non-white fat women dispute that their cultures are generally more fat-accepting: [http://www.allisonj.org/2009/08/05/black-overweight-women/ Are Black People More Accepting of Overweight Women?]
  +
  +
== See also ==
  +
  +
* [[Body image]]
  +
  +
== Further reading ==
  +
  +
* [http://kateharding.net/faq/ But don't you realise fat is unhealthy?], and the archives of [http://kateharding.net/ Shapely Prose] in general
  +
* [http://www.therotund.com/ The Rotund] Marianne Kirby's fat acceptance blog
 
[[Category:Intersections]]
 
[[Category:Intersections]]

Revision as of 04:22, 1 April 2013

Fat acceptance (sometimes size acceptance) is an anti-oppression movement opposing discrimination against people who are fat or obese.

Principles

  • thinness and health are far from perfectly correlated, but public health information and commercial interests regularly conflate weight loss with getting fitter and/or healthier in a way that is cruel, shaming, and not evidence-based
  • there is no known evidence-based weight-loss regime that results in long-term weight loss for all but a small minority of fat people
  • fat people are targeted for shaming and discriminated against, in particular:
    • they are subject to slurs and harassment
    • they have difficulty getting medical care without constant discussion of their weight and weight-loss plans, many have serious disorders ignored or misdiagnosed because it is assumed they'd be healthier if they lost weight
  • people do not have an obligation to themselves or to society to be healthy in any case, so even if body size is unhealthy for an individual, it is not therefore imperative on them to lose weight or imperative on others to try and convince them to do so

Fat discrimination in geek culture

Discrimination against fat people takes some particular forms in geek culture:

  • many geeks pride themselves on using science- and evidence-based approaches to life, and see being fat as an irrational choice
  • some geeks interpret the findings of evolutionary biology as meaning that people they judge as unhealthy or unattractive should not reproduce or even should die in order to serve the goal of improving the gene pool
  • geek women are often supposed to be "hot" in order to be welcome: thin, young and otherwise conventionally attractive

Intersectionality problems

As with many anti-oppression movements, there are sometimes intersectionality problems, where the movement caters mostly to otherwise privileged fat people. Some fat acceptance arguments have been criticised on several axes:

See also

Further reading